10 October, 2024 Revista Digital sobre Patentes, Marcas y Propiedad Intelectual

Unfair competition, a changing point of view

Por  Santiago Nadal

Spanish Unfair Competition Law is nowadays used as a tool to guarantee freedom of competitors and the fairness market behavior. Commercial Courts have changed its application; from the classical cases, related to imitation of products, to more complex behaviors.

CLASSICAL TOPICS

Classical unfair competition

Classical examples refer to obvious anti-competition behaviors easily recognizable by the average consumer: imitation, confusion, deceit, slander, collation.

 1) Imitation

As a principle, imitation is free, according to section 11 of the Law. However it is forbidden if there is infringement of any intellectual or industrial property rights, risk of confusion for consumers, or misuse of a third party’s reputation or efforts.

Case Law refers to the “double protection circle”: to imitate a product, regardless of whether it is not registered, may be deemed unfair (i.e. if it can be associated with other products). To check or verify whether there is unfair imitation, the product and its presentation have to be studied in its totality: partial differences may not “save” a product if the general vision is confusing.

The imitation of characteristics of a product is not considered unfair, when the imitation is avoidable. For example, some characteristics of a type of product have to be inevitably shared.

2) Confusion and Association

Section 6 of the Unfair Competition Law condemns any act creating confusion/association among products/services and those of the competitors.

Consumers may believe that a product belongs to another company (confusion) or associate the product to other products from another company (association). The pure risk of confusion will be considered unfair.

3) Deceit / Slander / Collation

Section 8 of the Unfair Competition Law considers unfair any behavior that may lead to a mistake about the characteristics of the product and/or the companies. This is also punished by the Publicity Law. It refers to grant bonus and acts as a “hook” to purchase the product. Risk alone is punished – no actual mistake is required.

Section 9 of the Unfair Competition Law prohibits any false statement against a competitor’s market prestige aiming to damage the competitor’s credit. This is also forbidden by section 6.  For example, Case Law states it is discrediting to say a wine is blurred or a competitor is insolvent when it is not true.

Exact, true or appropriate declarations are deemed fair unless referring to beliefs or personal information (which are not permitted).

Sections 10 of the Law consider unfair any comparison that refers to non-analogue, irrelevant or unverifiable items. Verifiable comparisons are permitted to help consumers to decide.

 http://www.snabogados.com/

 

Comparte tu opinión sobre este artículo

Comentarios

Related Posts

Profiling IP

7 diciembre, 2011

7 diciembre, 2011

“Innovate or die” – such is the commercial wisdom of today’s knowledge-based economy. Today, business success hinges on the delivery...

Cracking Ideas

12 enero, 2012

12 enero, 2012

Por: WIPO MAGANIZE Aardman, creators of Britain’s national treasures, Wallace & Gromit, have learned how to retain, and profit from,...

Vaccine delivery breakthrough

5 septiembre, 2012

5 septiembre, 2012 1

Infectious diseases kill millions of people every year and children under the age of five, especially those in developing countries, are particularly...

Is it WIPO’s leadership a fairytale or a linchpin for development?

4 febrero, 2020

4 febrero, 2020 1

Just a little over a month to finalize the marathon for positioning at the helm of WIPO as Director-General. A...

Architecture & Copyright Controversies

20 abril, 2012

20 abril, 2012

Por: WIPO MAGAZINE 2011   Architecture is deeply woven into the fabric of human history and culture, and its influence...

Culture: good business for everybody

18 enero, 2013

18 enero, 2013

Víctor Manuel Guízar López/Ginebra, Suiza The times have been left behind when culture and business travelled on different paths. Thanks to...

A patent in the Bible?

15 octubre, 2012

15 octubre, 2012

Por Esteban Santamaría Hernández The bible is one of the most antiques and important text in human history; it’s not only...

Country Brand®, a Registered Identity

4 enero, 2012

4 enero, 2012

Por: Manuel Mora MacBeath/mipatente I Collage digital: Willy A country brand is not merely the calling card of a nation, but...

Apple is making Passwords Obsolete With New Face Recognition Patent

13 enero, 2012

13 enero, 2012

Por: LDG. Maria Jose Oyanguren Guedea As we know, Apple solve all of our problems and make our lives easier.  For...

At Risk: US National Security and Intellectual Property

16 noviembre, 2012

16 noviembre, 2012

Yazmin Galindo Once upon a time, the United States was both thought of – and was in reality – the international...

The Circumstances Under Which the Trademark May be Cancelled according to Egyptian Law

20 junio, 2012

20 junio, 2012

By Shaimaa Solaiman Law Firm Challengue Introduction: According to the Egyptian IP Law No. 82 /2002, the cancellation of a trademark under...

THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE IN COPYRIGHT LAW

28 noviembre, 2016

28 noviembre, 2016

Synopsis: This article analyzes the fair use doctrine in U.S. Copyright Law, as well as relevant case law, focusing in...

Cannabis: Trademark Validity

10 febrero, 2012

10 febrero, 2012

Por: Giulio Cesare Zanetti The Court of First Instance of the European Community by issuing Judgment No T-234/06 confronted the...

Comments
Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.