29 March, 2024 Revista Digital sobre Patentes, Marcas y Propiedad Intelectual

At Risk: US National Security and Intellectual Property

Yazmin Galindo

Once upon a time, the United States was both thought of – and was in reality – the international leader in communication technology; now it is being successfully challenged in this arena by foreign companies. One such firm is Huawei, a major Chinese telecommunications equipment and services company.

Huawei is headquartered on the Google campus in Shenzhen, not far from Hong Kong; its main office in the US is in Plano, Texas. The company has achieved a global reach, with a presence in Europe, Africa and Latin America. It is the only company in the US equipped to build 4G systems providing mobile ultra-broadband Internet access, capable of handling high volumes of data, phone calls and high-definition video. Huawei products include smartphones, routers and switchers. What needs to be emphasized here is that this company has the know-how required to gain access to sensitive national security information, intellectual property, and US corporate and consumer data.

It is for these reasons that Huawei has become a matter of huge concern to the US government. For example, the Intelligence Committee of the US House of Representatives has expressed its alarm over alleged violations by the company of Chinese government regulations and its acquisition of information belonging to US companies and consumers, posing a serious security threat.1

Huawei has managed to establish and maintain networks in US rural markets. Craig Mock, the President and General Manager of United Wireless, headquartered in Dodge City, Kansas, hired Huawei as a vendor, leading to an interrogation of Mock by the House Intelligence Committee.

Members of Congress have also voiced dismay regarding a 5 billion contract that Huawei was negotiating with Sprint, to build the latter a new 4G wireless network.

In 2008, Motorola sued Huawei for an act of industrial espionage – allegedly stealing Motorola intellectual property.2

In an effort to improve its somewhat tarnished image, Bill Plommer, Huawei’s Vice President, said in an interview that the company had been the target of much misinformation and innuendo, and that Huawei is nothing more than “a business doing business.” 3 Plommer added that the company’s dealings are an open book, which begs the question, “Why the lack of communication over the past 10 years?” It should be pointed out that Ran Zhengfei, Huawei’s CEO, has never granted an interview with the media. One step Huawei could take to show that is indeed serious about transparency is to explain its relationship with the Chinese government and China’s Communist Party

1 https://www.law.upenn.edu/blogs/regblog/2012/10/24-takahashi-chinese-telecom.html

2 http://paidcontent.org/2011/01/24/419-one-more-ip-infringement-suit-huawei-vs-motorola/

3 http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57527441/huawei-probed-for-security-
espionage-risk/?pageNum=3&tag=contentMain%3bcontentBody

 

Committee.

Huawei’s successes in the communications industry should be regarded as a wake-up call to US companies. They allowed dominance in the electronics and automobile industries to slip away; they must get to work on innovative strategies designed to restore them to their position as telecommunications technology industry leaders, capable of protecting national security and intellectual property.

 

Comparte tu opinión sobre este artículo

Comentarios

Related Posts

A patent in the Bible?

15 octubre, 2012

15 octubre, 2012

Por Esteban Santamaría Hernández The bible is one of the most antiques and important text in human history; it’s not only...

Profiling IP

7 diciembre, 2011

7 diciembre, 2011

“Innovate or die” – such is the commercial wisdom of today’s knowledge-based economy. Today, business success hinges on the delivery...

Cracking Ideas

12 enero, 2012

12 enero, 2012

Por: WIPO MAGANIZE Aardman, creators of Britain’s national treasures, Wallace & Gromit, have learned how to retain, and profit from,...

Culture: good business for everybody

18 enero, 2013

18 enero, 2013

Víctor Manuel Guízar López/Ginebra, Suiza The times have been left behind when culture and business travelled on different paths. Thanks to...

Architecture & Copyright Controversies

20 abril, 2012

20 abril, 2012

Por: WIPO MAGAZINE 2011   Architecture is deeply woven into the fabric of human history and culture, and its influence...

Unfair competition, a changing point of view

20 julio, 2012

20 julio, 2012

Por  Santiago Nadal Spanish Unfair Competition Law is nowadays used as a tool to guarantee freedom of competitors and the fairness...

Apple is making Passwords Obsolete With New Face Recognition Patent

13 enero, 2012

13 enero, 2012

Por: LDG. Maria Jose Oyanguren Guedea As we know, Apple solve all of our problems and make our lives easier.  For...

THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE IN COPYRIGHT LAW

28 noviembre, 2016

28 noviembre, 2016

Synopsis: This article analyzes the fair use doctrine in U.S. Copyright Law, as well as relevant case law, focusing in...

Country Brand®, a Registered Identity

4 enero, 2012

4 enero, 2012

Por: Manuel Mora MacBeath/mipatente I Collage digital: Willy A country brand is not merely the calling card of a nation, but...

The Circumstances Under Which the Trademark May be Cancelled according to Egyptian Law

20 junio, 2012

20 junio, 2012

By Shaimaa Solaiman Law Firm Challengue Introduction: According to the Egyptian IP Law No. 82 /2002, the cancellation of a trademark under...

Is it WIPO’s leadership a fairytale or a linchpin for development?

4 febrero, 2020

4 febrero, 2020 1

Just a little over a month to finalize the marathon for positioning at the helm of WIPO as Director-General. A...

Vaccine delivery breakthrough

5 septiembre, 2012

5 septiembre, 2012 1

Infectious diseases kill millions of people every year and children under the age of five, especially those in developing countries, are particularly...

Cannabis: Trademark Validity

10 febrero, 2012

10 febrero, 2012

Por: Giulio Cesare Zanetti The Court of First Instance of the European Community by issuing Judgment No T-234/06 confronted the...

Comments
Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.