20 April, 2024 Revista Digital sobre Patentes, Marcas y Propiedad Intelectual

Updates on Non-Traditional Marks in Japan

WRITTEN BY: Yoko Someya, Ttrademark attorney OGASAWARA PATENT OFFICE, DAIDO-SEIMEI ESAKA BLDG., 13TH FLOOR

1-23-101, ESAKA-CHO, SUITA-SHI, OSAKA 564-0063 JAPAN, E-MAIL: [email protected]

Updates on Non-Traditional Marks in Japan

One year has passed since sound marks, moving marks, hologram marks, color marks and position marks became protectable under the Japanese Trademark Law. The first Notice of Acceptance for the non-traditional marks was issued on November 6, 2015. However, examination of the non-traditional marks at the Japan Patent Office mostly takes more time than that of traditional marks. In the meantime, the examination guideline on distinctiveness of marks has been revised as of April 1, 2016. This report introduces updates on the non-traditional marks, including statistics, examples of registered marks and the revised regulations.

I. The statistics of application (registration) of each non-traditional mark

The number of applications for the non-traditional marks filed with the JPO from April 1, 2015 to April 6, 2016 is shown in the table below. 32 sound marks have been allowed for registration among 407 applications and 26 moving marks have been allowed for registration among 87 applications. So far, 472 applications were filed for color marks, however, none of them is allowed for registration.

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.51.44

II. Update on the non-traditional marks respectively

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.52.22

[Source: Trademark data as of May 17, 2016 at J-PlatPat]

II. Update on the non-traditional marks respectively (i) Sound Marks

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.54.48

Sound marks consisting of jingle, sound or melody without lyrics (words) have not been allowed for registration. The mark below (JP Trademark Application No. 2015-29809) was filed on April 1, 2015 and is still pending.

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.52.57

[Definition of Use]
In accordance with the revised Trademark Law, ‘act to sound a sound mark’ and ‘act to record a sound mark in a recording media (DVDs, master tapes and so on)’ are considered as use of the sound mark. Since act to pronounce a word mark is not prescribed as use of a mark, it would be advisable to obtain trademark right for a sound mark if the sound mark is used or licensed.

(ii) Moving Marks

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.56.05

(iii) Hologram Marks

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.57.21

(iv) Marks consisting exclusively of one or several colors

No color mark has been allowed for registration. In accordance with the examination guideline, all color marks are not inherently distinctive and it is required to submit evidence to prove acquired distinctiveness through use.

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 14.58.58

(v) Position marks

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 15.00.13 Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 15.00.38

The position marks below do not contain any distinctive word and are still pending.

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 15.01.10

In accordance with the examination guideline, if a position mark is considered by the relevant public as decoration, ornament or pattern to improve aesthetic impression or function of goods, the position mark shall be rejected as a non-distinctive mark. However, in line with a recent trend in appeal decisions on 3D marks, a position mark consisting of part of design of goods or packages may be distinctive, if the position mark is characteristic, original, prominent or famous and if identical or similar signs are not commonly used in the relevant business circle.

III. Acquired distinctiveness through use

Whether distinctiveness through use has been acquired or not will be examined in consideration of (i) applied mark, (ii) mark actually used, sales volume, duration and geographical area of use, (iii) advertising method, frequency, area and costs, (iv) existence of identical or similar marks used by a third party, (v) goods or services and other considerations in the relevant market and (vi) survey on recognition of the mark by the relevant consumers.

IV. Right to Continuous Use of Unregistered Sound Marks, Moving Marks, Hologram Marks and Color Marks
If a person/company has used a sound mark, moving mark, hologram mark or color mark, which is identical or similar to other’s registered mark used for identical or similar goods or services, before the date of enforcement of the revised laws, the person/company is entitled to have a right to continuous use of the unregistered mark within the geographical area or scope of business as of April 1, 2015. If the mark had become well-known among the relevant public as of April 1, 2015, the mark can be used without the geographical limitation.

For more information, please feel free to contact us at [email protected]

Captura de pantalla 2016-06-03 a las 15.01.46

Comparte tu opinión sobre este artículo

Comentarios

Related Posts

¿A quién beneficia el Sistema de Oposición en México?

30 agosto, 2016

30 agosto, 2016

Fuente: RODRIGO LANUZA ACOSTA, Socio Fundador, Grupo SELCO®, www.gruposelco.com, [email protected]   Rodrigo Lanuza de Grupo Selco® habla en exclusiva para mi patente. Comparte tu opinión...

Cede NASA a Blue Origin plataforma para probar cohetes

17 abril, 2019

17 abril, 2019

La NASA firmó un acuerdo con la compañía Blue Origin que permitirá acelerar el desarrollo de la industria espacial comercial en Estados Unidos.

Amazon disputa (por casi 7 años) dominio de internet con ocho países

22 abril, 2019

22 abril, 2019

¿A quién debe pertenecer el dominio “.amazon”, al gigante minorista o a los países donde está la selva del Amazonas?

Propiedad Intelectual en la Industria 4.0

29 abril, 2016

29 abril, 2016

FUENTE: Adrianni Zanatta., Adrianni Zanatta Alarcón, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Politecnico di Milano.,  Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italia, [email protected]  ...

Científicos curan heridas con pegamentos de células madre

24 abril, 2019

24 abril, 2019

Ahora se puede crear una nueva generación de pegamentos quirúrgicos inteligentes para heridas crónicas

SOLICITUD DE DIVISIÓN DE PATENTE VOLUNTARIA Y EL CRITERIO DEL IMPI PARA RECONOCERLA

16 enero, 2019

16 enero, 2019

Autores: FERMÍN REYES y DANIEL HERNÁNDEZ VILLA, Legarreta y Asociados, SC, www.legarreta.com.mx, [email protected], [email protected]. Ciudad de México, México. Recientemente obtuvimos...

El arte de Patentar

9 abril, 2016

9 abril, 2016

Entrevista al  Lic Rodrigo Lanuza Director General de Revista MiPatente para CONACYT y Radio Conciencia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OV3h-_aJUvQ Comparte tu opinión sobre...

Desarrolla CICESE tecnología para captar agua de la niebla costera

19 julio, 2017

19 julio, 2017

FUENTE: ANTIMIO CRUZ BUSTAMANTE, Reportero de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Revista Digital Mi Patente, [email protected], www.mipatente.com Científicos mexicanos desarrollan una...

Innovación ¿Cómo lograrla?

31 marzo, 2016

31 marzo, 2016

FUENTE: Adrianni Zanatta Alarcón, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Politecnico di Milano., Vía La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italia, [email protected]   Innovación ¿Cómo lograrla? Adrianni...

Impresión 3D ¿Juguete o revolución?

2 diciembre, 2016

2 diciembre, 2016

La impresión 3D o Manufactura Aditiva (AM) es una macro categoría que engloba diversas técnicas para la elaboración de piezas...

¿QUÉ TIPO DE CONTRATO DEBES FIRMAR AL CEDER DERECHOS DE AUTOR?

16 mayo, 2016

16 mayo, 2016

FUENTE: Paloma Berenice Contreras Díaz., Senior, Calderón&De la Sierra (Attorneys at law), México, [email protected],  www.cyslaw.mx Como ya hemos explicado con anterioridad, los derechos patrimoniales de autor[1] son los...

MPI y BSA refrendan colaboración para incentivar la innovación a través del uso de software legal

8 febrero, 2018

8 febrero, 2018

Pretende que las empresas adopten prácticas de negocios que involucren la gestión de software legal como parte de sus activos...

Superindustria niega registro de marca TOP GEAR y protege serie televisiva

6 abril, 2016

6 abril, 2016

FUENTE: Henry Roberto Plazas F., Jefe de Prensa, Delegatura Propiedad Industrial, Superintendencia deIndustria y Comercio, www.sic.gov.co Colombia   La Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio negó la marca TOP GEAR...

México tiene un buen sistema de protección a la propiedad intelectual: Pfizer

28 septiembre, 2016

28 septiembre, 2016

México tiene un sistema de protección a la propiedad intelectual sólido y ese es uno de los factores centrales para...

COMPROBACIÓN Y DECLARACIÓN DE USO DE MARCA

9 enero, 2019

9 enero, 2019

Por: Lic. José Roberto Garza García. www.promapmx.com  LA EXCLUSIVIDAD NACE CON EL REGISTRO En virtud de las reformas de la...